Welcome to Doc's Sports Service Betonline Banner
spacer  
spacer spacer
Welcome to Doc's Sports Service spacer
Welcome to Doc's Sports Service Welcome to Doc's Sports Service
Welcome to Doc's Sports Service
Click Here to Purchase Doc's Picks
Basketball Picks   |   Hockey picks   |   NBA picks
Football Picks   |   NFL Picks
spacer



Live Lines and Odds NFL Odds
spacer
College Football Odds
spacer
NBA Odds
spacer
College
   Basketball Odds

spacer
MLB Odds
spacer
NHL Odds
spacer
Breeders Cup Odds
spacer
WNBA Odds
spacer
CFL Odds
spacer
Boxing Odds
spacer
Golf Odds
spacer
Soccer Odds
spacer
Week 16 NFL Odds
spacer
Doc's Rotation
spacer

Free Picks by Sport Free NFL Picks
spacer
Free College Football Picks
spacer
Free NBA Picks
spacer
Free College Basketball Picks
spacer
Free NHL Picks
spacer
All Free Picks
spacer
Free MLB Picks
spacer
Free NASCAR Picks
spacer

Handicapping Matchup Reports NFL
spacer
NCAA Football
spacer
NBA
spacer
NCAA Basketball
spacer
MLB
spacer
NHL
spacer

Scores NFL
spacer
NCAA Football
spacer
NBA
spacer
NCAA Basketball
spacer
MLB
spacer
NHL
spacer

Schedules 2014-2015 Bowl Game Schedule
spacer
NFL Schedule
spacer
College Football Schedule
spacer
College Basketball Schedule
spacer
MLB Schedule
spacer
NBA Schedule
spacer
NHL Schedule
spacer
Monday Night Football Schedule
spacer

Upcomming Event Coverage Monday Night Football Picks and Predictions
spacer
MLB Futures Odds
spacer
2014-2015 Bowl Game Schedule
spacer




Betonline Banner
spacer
spacer
Home
spacer
View Picks
spacer
Why Doc's Sports?
spacer
Our Betting System
spacer
Sports Betting Strategy
spacer
Message from the GM
spacer
Our Commitment
spacer
Customer Comments
spacer
Free Picks
spacer
Contact Doc's
spacer

The Advisory Board
Our Commitment
spacer
Doc's Sports
spacer
Robert Ferringo
spacer
Allen Eastman
spacer
Raphael Esparza (VSI)
spacer
Indian Cowboy
spacer
Jason Sharpe
spacer
Strike Point Sports
spacer
Mike Davis
spacer

Betting Systems
11th Hour Sports
spacer
The Prop Machine
spacer
Wiseguy War Room
spacer

Recomended Sportsbooks Bovada Sportsbook
spacer
5Dimes Sportsbook
spacer
BookMaker
spacer
Sportsbook
spacer
WagerWeb
spacer
BetOnline Sportsbook
spacer
GT Bets
spacer
Sportsbook Bonus
spacer

Handicapping Resources
Mobile Website Directions
spacer
Weekly NFL Survivor Pool Picks
spacer
NFL Power Rankings 2014
spacer
NFL Office Pool Picks
spacer
Sports Betting Money Managment
spacer
Handicapping FAQ
spacer
Sports Betting 101
spacer
How To Betting Articles
spacer
Ultimate Picks Betting Guide
spacer
Sports Betting Tips
spacer
Parlay Calculator
spacer
Sports Betting Systems
spacer
Parlay Cards
spacer
Gambling Terms
spacer
2014 Archives
spacer
2013 Archives
spacer
2012 Archives
spacer
2011 Archives
spacer
2010 Archives
spacer
Doc's Affiliate Program
spacer
Doc's Writer Bios
spacer
Doc's rss feedDoc's RSS feed



spacer
spacer

NCAA Tournament Seed History
by - 5/8/2014

Share |
Michigan State's Keith Appling

From pretty much the first day of the college basketball season fans are focused on one thing above all else ó what seed their team is going to get in the NCAA Tournament. The tournament is the best three weeks in sports, and all the speculation that leads up to it about where teams will be seeded and who they will play just adds to the fun. Since seeds matter so much, NCAA Tournament seed history is worth studying for both fans and bettors. Hereís a primer:

NCAA Tournament seed history: key numbers

Free $60 in Member March Madness Picks No Obligation Click Here

0: It still hasnít happened ó a No. 16 seed upsetting a No. 1. In fact, it really hasnít come very close that often. Since 1997 there have been just three lowest seeds that have come within seven points of a win ó and thatís not really that close in the scheme of things. We have now seen an even 120 games featuring this most lopsided of matchups, and no upsets have happened. It seems inevitable that it will happen at some point, but we sure donít seem to be any closer now than we were when the tournament expanded to 64 teams. One thing you can be certain of, though, is that if and when it finally does happen, the team that pulls off the miracle will go down in history as an all-time great Cinderella story.

7: We didnít see a No. 15 stun a No. 2 in 2014, but that has been an exception in recent years. There have been seven No. 15 teams that have pulled a massive upset. Three of those came in 2012 and 2013. Though the difference between a No. 1 and No. 2 seed can be quite significant, it still seems improbable given the recent success of No. 15 teams that a No 16 will never pull off an upset.

1: Until this past year the combined total of Final Four appearances by No. 7 and No. 10 teams was zero. UConn changed that in a big way this year, though. Not only did they make the Final Four as a No. 7, but they won it all ó a result I still canít fully comprehend. The No. 10 teams still have a lot of work left to do, though. Stanford was the only No. 10 to win a game in the 2014 tournament, and they were done by the Sweet 16.

1: 2008 was the only time we have seen all the teams that were supposed to win their region actually do so. That year all four No. 1 seeds made the Final Four. Itís twice as common for no top seeds to make the Final Four ó that happened in both 2001 and 2006. In 2014 the only top seed to advance was Florida, and they were out in the semifinals.

18: Betting on a No. 1 seed to win it all is a safe bet. In the 30 years since the tournament expanded to 30 teams we have seen a top seed cut down the nets 18 times. Thatís 80 percent of all opportunities ó an impressive rate. Despite all the controversy every year, maybe the selection committee really does know what they are doing for the most part.

3: Hereís an odd quirk for you. When No. 11 Dayton lost to No. 1 Florida in the Elite Eight it wasnít that surprising on the surface, but it actually went against expectations. In five previous Elite Eight meetings between those seeds, the lower seed was actually 3-2. Top seeds had been far more dominant against No. 7, No. 10, No. 12 and No. 13 seeds over time. When No. 7 UConn beat No. 1 Florida in the Final Four in 2014, it marked the first time in 32 tries that one of those four seeds had knocked off a No. 1.

22: When Stanford knocked off Kansas in the second round in 2014, it was the 22nd time that a No. 10 had upset a No. 2 in the second round of the tournament. Given that the two seeds have clashed only 53 times, that is a remarkable winning percentage ó .415. The gap between No. 2 and No. 10 seeds should be quite large, so you would certainly expect the matchups between the seeds to be less competitive than they have been.

22: When Duke tipped off against Mercer in 2014, it was the 98th time that they had played a tournament game as the higher seed since the field expanded in 1985. Thatís quite remarkable if you think about it ó an average of more than three wins per year for three decades. The problem is, though, that the humiliating loss to No. 14 Mercer this year marked the 22nd time that they had lost as the higher seed. It seems to be almost an expectation in recent years that Duke will lose a game they really shouldnít, but it isnít necessarily a new trend for the powerhouse squad.

8: Kansas had an embarrassing second-round loss to Stanford as a No. 2 seed in 2014. While that was a real problem, Stanford still managed to accomplish something ó they extended their country-best streak of first round wins to eight years.

Want free sports betting picks? Docís Sports has you covered Ė get $60 worth of picks free from any of Docís Sports expert handicappers. Click here for free picks (new clients only).


Read more articles by

Share |

Most Recent March Madness Betting Articles