Welcome to Doc's Sports Service Sportsbook Banner
spacer  
spacer spacer
Welcome to Doc's Sports Service spacer
Welcome to Doc's Sports Service Welcome to Doc's Sports Service
Welcome to Doc's Sports Service
Click Here to Purchase Doc's Picks
Baseball Picks   |   Football Picks   |   Hockey picks
Kentucky Derby Picks   |   NBA Picks
spacer



Live Lines and Odds NFL Odds
spacer
NBA Odds
spacer
College
   Basketball Odds

spacer
MLB Odds
spacer
NHL Odds
spacer
WNBA Odds
spacer
CFL Odds
spacer
Boxing Odds
spacer
Golf Odds
spacer
Sports Odds
spacer

Free Picks by Sport Free NFL Picks
spacer
Free College Football Picks
spacer
Free NBA Picks
spacer
Free College Basketball Picks
spacer
Free MLB Picks
spacer
Free NHL Picks
spacer
All Free Picks
spacer

Handicapping Matchup Reports NFL
spacer
NCAA Football
spacer
NBA
spacer
NCAA Basketball
spacer
MLB
spacer
NHL
spacer

Scores NFL
spacer
NCAA Football
spacer
NBA
spacer
NCAA Basketball
spacer
MLB
spacer
NHL
spacer

Schedules MLB Schedule
spacer
NBA Schedule
spacer
NHL Schedule
spacer

Upcomming Event Coverage MLB Futures Odds
spacer
2014 Kentucky Derby
spacer
2014 Kentucky Derby Form
spacer
2014 NBA Playoff Brackets
spacer
2014 NHL Playoff Brackets
spacer




Sportsbook Banner
spacer
spacer
Home
spacer
View Picks
spacer
Why Doc's Sports?
spacer
Our Betting System
spacer
Sports Betting Strategy
spacer
Message from the GM
spacer
Our Commitment
spacer
Customer Comments
spacer
Free Picks
spacer
Contact Doc's
spacer

The Advisory Board
Our Commitment
spacer
Doc's Sports
spacer
Robert Ferringo
spacer
Allen Eastman
spacer
Raphael Esparza (VSI)
spacer
Indian Cowboy
spacer
Jason Sharpe
spacer
Strike Point Sports
spacer
Chad Matthews
spacer

Betting Systems
11th Hour Sports
spacer
The Prop Machine
spacer

Recomended Sportsbooks Bovada Sportsbook
spacer
5Dimes Sportsbook
spacer
BookMaker
spacer
Sportsbook
spacer
Carbon Sports
spacer
WagerWeb
spacer
BetOnline Sportsbook
spacer
GT Bets
spacer
TopBet
spacer
SportsBettingOnline.ag
spacer
Sportsbook Bonus
spacer

Handicapping Resources
Mobile Website Directions
spacer
2014 NFL Season Win Totals Predictions
spacer
Sports Betting Money Managment
spacer
Handicapping FAQ
spacer
Sports Betting 101
spacer
Sports Betting Tips
spacer
Parlay Calculator
spacer
Sports Betting Systems
spacer
Parlay Cards
spacer
Gambling Terms
spacer
2014 Archives
spacer
2013 Archives
spacer
2012 Archives
spacer
2011 Archives
spacer
2010 Archives
spacer
Doc's Affiliate Program
spacer
Doc's Writer Bios
spacer
Doc's rss feedDoc's RSS feed



spacer
spacer

NCAA Tournament Seed History
by - 3/7/2014

Share |
Louisville G Russ Smith

The greatest single time in sports every year is drawing near ó the day we get to fill out our NCAA Tournament brackets. We wonít have a really good sense of how to fill out a winning bracket until the field is set and we see what path each team has to follow to get to the promised land. History plays a big role in how to fill out a bracket, though, so letís fill the time until Selection Sunday by looking at some NCAA Tournament seed history.

Free $60 in Member College Basketball Picks. No Obligation Click Here

NCAA Tournament seed history: key numbers

0: Most fans ó from the casual to the most committed ó want, on some level, to see a No. 16 seed shock the world and pull off an impossible upset of a No. 1. History is not kind on this front. Since the tournament expanded to 64 teams (and now more), there have been 116 games between the top teams and the bottom dwellers, and the No. 1 teams have an unblemished record. Last year provided the most hope on this front that we have seen, though. From 1997 to 2012 only one No. 16 team had come as close as seven points away from an upset. Last year Western Kentucky came within seven points of Kansas, and Southern only lost to Gonzaga by six points. This is one of the most wide-open tournament fields we have seen in a long time, so maybe this is the year that a top seed becomes famous for all the wrong reasons.

7: When Florida Gulf Coast stunned Georgetown last year they became the seventh No. 15 to upset a No. 2, and the third in the last two years. The gap between top seeds and feisty mid-major conference winners isnít nearly as big as it used to be.

0: There has never been a single No. 7 or No. 10 seed in the Final Four. Every other seed has been represented at least once. No. 9 was the last seed to fall, but Wichita State broke that drought last year.

1: A lot of years it seems like the No. 1 seeds are dominant, and itís hard to imagine how any of them are going to lose until they run into another No. 1. 2008 was the only time, though, that all four No. 1 seeds have advanced to the Final Four. It has been twice as common for no No. 1 seeds to advance ó that happened in 2006 and again in 2001. Louisville was the only top seed to advance last year.

18: Louisville won as a top seed last year. That marked the 18th time since the field expanded to 64 teams in 1985 that a No. 1 has cut down the nets. Six of the last seven winners have been No. 1 seeds, so unless you are looking to gamble, making a chalky pick for the winner is probably a good idea.

3: A No. 11 has met up with a No. 1 in the Elite Eight five teams. Oddly, the lower seed has a 3-2 edge in those matchups. We didnít come close to seeing an upset last year, though. Minnesota was the only No. 11 to win a game, and they lost their second game. The success of the No. 11 teams in these situations is particularly odd because No. 1 teams have a combined record of 31-0 against No 7, 10, 12 and 13 teams.

21: Since 1985 we have seen a No. 10 pull off a first-round upset and meet up with a No. 2 in the second round 52 times. The higher seeds have an edge in the meetings but not nearly as much of one as they should have given the difference in quality between the teams on paper. The No. 10 teams have won 21 of the 52 meetings, which is a solid .404 win percentage.

15: Villanova loves being a lower seed. Thirty times since 1985 they have tipped off as the lower seed in the game. They have wildly exceeded expectations, winning exactly half of those games. They fell in their opener as a No. 9 seed last year, but they can always look back fondly on 1985 when they won five games as the lower seed to take down the title as a No. 8 seed. Florida is the only team with at least 15 games as a lower seed to have a winning record ó they have won eight of 15. As a likely No. 1 seed this year, though, that success will be irrelevant. On the flip side, Duke leads the way with 21 losses as a higher seed. They won three games as a higher seed last year, though, and have played 97 in total, so their winning percentage as a higher seed is still respectable.

7: Kansas has bragging rights as the team with the longest streak of winning at least one game and advancing at least to the Round of 32. Last year they were tied with Wisconsin at six straight years. While Kansas won two games last year, though, Wisconsin was upset as No. 5 by Ole Miss in the opening round last year.

72: As you would expect, the first-round showdowns between No. 8 and No. 9 is the tightest of battles. The teams went 2-2 in their four games last year, so the higher seeds maintained their slight four-game advantage ó they are 72-68 since 1985.

Docís Sports Advisory Board has set some lofty standards worldwide for March Madness handicapping. They normally do their best work during the NCAA Tournament. Click here for $60 worth of free college basketball picks. No credit card needed, and you will never deal with a salesman.

Read more articles by

Share |

Most Recent College Basketball Handicapping Articles